The Supreme Court issues an order to the impotent BoU on Sudhir and Meera's outstanding expenses in the Crane Bank Saga

 


Following its historic judgement in the Crane Bank case on February 11th, 2022, the Supreme Court of Uganda issued an official order this month instructing the Bank of Uganda to pay costs to businessman Sudhir Ruparelia and his Meera Investments Ltd.

The Supreme Court further directed the Bank of Uganda to restore Crane Bank to its shareholders in the July 1, 2022, judgement, noting that the appellant (Crane Bank Limitedreceivership )'s expired on January 20, 2018.

The Supreme Court denied the Bank of Uganda's appeal against Dr Sudhir and his Meera Investments firm in February of this year.

The court ordered BoU to pay all court expenses immediately and to restore Crane Bank to its original owners in its verdict.

A panel of five judges rendered the decision, which comprised Rubby Opio Aweri, Percy Tuhaise, Ezekiel Muhanguzi, Prof. Tabatemwa Ekirikubinza, and Faith Mwondha.

To prevent uncertainty, the Court of Appeal confirmed the trial court's decision, which ordered that the Bank of Uganda bear the expenses of the claim since it was responsible for the filing of the complaint and other subsequent acts. "The Supreme Court decided that the order shall remain."

"We equally examined this element in our judgement and determined that the appellant's (Crane Bank in receivership) receivership had terminated on January 20, 2018." The significance of that judgement, in our opinion, is that the appellant's management be returned to shareholders after January 20, 2018."

In September of last year, the Bank of Uganda decided to abandon a Supreme Court appeal challenging the Court of Appeal's rejection of Crane Bank Ltd. (in Receivership) vs. Sudhir Ruparelia and Meera Investments Ltd.

The Supreme Court Registrar noted in a notice of withdrawal dated September 15, 2021 that BOU had chosen not to pursue the appeal and would pay costs.

In 2020, the Bank of Uganda filed an appeal with the Supreme Court against a Court of Appeal verdict that upheld an earlier High Court decision to reject a complaint brought by Crane Bank in receivership against businessman Sudhir.

Previously, the Court of Appeal in Kampala dismissed a complaint against Dr. Sudhir.

The panel of justices, chaired by acting Chief Justice Alfonse Owiny-Dollo, backed Commercial Court judge David K. Wangutusi's decision in an application brought by the Bank of Uganda demanding a repayment of Shs397 billion from Sudhir, which he allegedly stole from the defunct Crane Bank. The lawsuit was dismissed without prejudice.

The Bank of Uganda/Crane Bank in Receivership (BoU) has filed an appeal against an August 26, 2019 judgement in which the High Court Commercial Division rejected the multi-billion dollar case with costs.

 In his decision, Justice Wangutusi declared that the Bank of Uganda/Crane Bank (in receivership) lacked a legal basis to sue Sudhir, the owner of Crane Bank, Uganda's second largest bank at the time, and ordered the Bank of Uganda to pay Sudhir's legal fees.

The property developer and Meera Investments Limited were sued for allegedly defrauding the defunct Crane Bank Limited (CBL) of Shs397 billion, which the central bank demanded be repaid.

Sudhir disputed the accusation and has subsequently counter-sued BoU for breach of contract damages of $8 million (Shs28 billion).

He urged the Commercial Court to dismiss the lawsuit, claiming that the central bank exceeded its authority by filing legal action against him and his Meera Investments Company.

Sudhir, via his attorneys, Kampala Associated Advocates, filed an objection against BoU, telling Justice Wangutusi that when dissolving a bank, BoU has three alternatives, including placing someone else in charge—what is known as statutory management, receivership, or liquidation.

However, despite the fact that the law requires only the management and liquidator of the mentioned bank to bring an action, not a receiver, BoU selected receivership.He went on to say that as a Receiver, BoU could only dissolve or sell Crane Bank within a year, but not suit its management.

In response to Sudhir's attorneys' remarks, BoU, via its counsel Dr Joseph Byamugisha, informed the court that when a financial institution is put under receivership, the capacity to trade or proceed with a civil action does not cease.

Crane Bank was put under statutory administration by BoU on October 20, 2016, due to undercapitalization.

The central bank blamed Crane Bank's undercapitalisation on mismanagement and insider lending, which resulted in an unsustainable non-performing loan portfolio. In January 2017, the bank was sold to DFCU Bank, while the central bank maintained part of its liabilities.

Sudhir's bank, Uganda's second largest bank and largest indigenous financial institution, was closed down by the Bank of Uganda.

Separate examinations conducted by the Auditor General and Parliament have discovered contradictory evidence underlying the acquisition and sale of Crane Bank. It was also uncovered that BoU executives lacked professionalism, closing six other banks in the same shoddy and unlawful way.

Post a Comment

0 Comments