"In the current case, the BoU and its officials
are accused of abusing their public office and duties in a variety of ways, but
the gist of the allegation is that all such matters were done for the corrupt
purpose of obtaining undue advantage in the form of huge financial inducements
from a third-party purchaser of CBL or its assets, in the event of DFCU
Bank." Because of its alleged participation in compromising the BOU, I
believe it is conceivable that DFCU Bank cannot depend on foreign acts of state
rule.
"I would therefore allow the appeal on the basis
of the Public Policy Exception," said Lord Justice Popplewell and Sir
Julian Flaux, Chancellor of the Court of Appeal from England's High Court of
Justice Business and Property Courts.
According to Sudhir Ruparelia and seven other petitioners, DFCU Bank and its stockholders purchased Crane Bank Limited (CBL) in a well-crafted corruption scheme involving Bank of Uganda officials. The Court also recommended that Bank of Uganda officials involved in the transaction face corruption charges.
In summary, the Court made the following orders in
favor of the appellants, the Crane Bank proprietors:
Meanwhile, it's worth mentioning that this is yet another significant victory for billionaire Sudhir Ruparelia, the owner of the bankrupt Crane Bank, who overcame BoU in the Supreme Court over the sale of his bank in July 2022.
Crane Bank was closed down by the central bank in October 2016, stating it was undercapitalized. The 2022 ruling was the culmination of a running battle between the central bank and Sudhir for over four years. The Supreme Court declared that Crane Bank should be returned to Sudhir and ordered BoU to pay all fees, believed to be more than UGX 200 billion.
0 Comments