Indian nationals involved in a false URA invoice scam were released after paying a sh20 fine.


 In an unexpected turn of events, a group of Indian businessmen who were sent to Luzira prison last week for participating in a major tax criminal network have been freed after paying a pitiful Sh 20 million.

The directors of Wellex General Hardware in Nansana, Jigar Chandarana, 44, and Mr. Jitendra Sorathiya, 41, as well as their accountant, Mr. Ronak Moradiya Ghanshyambhai, 25, appeared before the Anti-Corruption Court in Kololo last week and were charged with five counts of creating and selling fictitious invoices that resulted in a significant financial loss for the Ugandan government.

The trio pleaded guilty to five crimes, including lying to a tax official in violation of Section 58 of the Tax Procedures Code Act of 2014. In addition, they paid Shs102 million in taxes.

According to investigations, the fraudsters collected a large sum of money from the network by engaging new clients with whom they sell false invoices and earn large commissions.

China Railway No.3 Engineering Group Limited, a well-known global engineering firm, is one of the syndicate's beneficiaries.

According to information collected, China Railway No.3 Engineering Group Ltd claimed input VAT of UGX. 211,869,259 on bogus purchases of UGX. 1,117,051,439, leading the government of Uganda to lose income.

China Railway is a wholly owned subsidiary of China Railway Group Limited, one of the world's largest construction firms, which is listed on the Shanghai and Hong Kong stock markets and is included among the Fortune Global 500.

According to the findings, Jigar and his associates, who are directors of Wellex General Hardware in Nansana, reported these bogus invoices as production VAT between 2018 and 2023.

However, their chances ran out when URA inspectors stormed their store and detained them in the wake of a tax investigation that started in 2022 after the tax organization learned about an Indian businessman accused of swapping tax bills among firms registered for VAT purposes.

The group was convicted on five counts of providing false statements to a tax officer, a violation of Section 58(1)(a) of the Tax Procedures Code Act of 2014, and found guilty of creating and selling fraudulent invoices by the Anti-Corruption Court in Kololo.

Each defendant was given the option of paying a fine of UGX 20,000,000 or risking five years in prison if they failed to do so.

URA representatives who spoke with this website about the issue said that they had been successful in both apprehending the offenders and retrieving money in the form of taxes from them.

They claimed to have been successful in collecting UGX 102,878,055 in taxes, which Wellex Hardware Limited consented to pay in full as determined.

So the key decision to ponder on: To Deport or Not?

Is a punishment of Shs 20 million, which is little in comparison to the money the cartel has gained from the illicit trade, enough to allow these international criminals off the hook? Alternatively, they ought to be deported as a precaution as there is no way to know whether they won't do the same crime again.

Old African proverb, "Once a thief, always a thief," demystifies how difficult it is for someone to give up a particular character or behavior.

This indicates that Courts of Judicature frequently discount claims made by criminals who are accused before judges that they are "first-time offenders" and need to be exonerated. They either receive a harsh punishment or a sentence. While they are in jail, we want to teach them a lesson.

A light sentence has the drawback of misleading. The criminal frequently commits the same crime twice.In other words, offenders who receive light punishments are trained to commit serious crimes.

Tax voids 

Uganda loses between 30 and 39% of the money that the Value Added Tax (VAT) is supposed to bring in. This information is included in a study named "The Value Added Tax Gap Analysis for Uganda" that was written by researchers Corti Paul Lakuma and Brian Sserunjogi from the Economic Policy Research Centre (EPRC).

According to the report, there is a compliance gap of between 30 and 39% between the actual revenues received and the potential revenues that might have been generated given the legislative framework in existence at the time.

The predicted disparity is close to levels in Latin American nations and larger than normally seen levels in Sub-Saharan countries. The researchers found that in prior years, the projected compliance gap climbed to 64% of potential income.

Large compliance gaps were discovered among manufacturers. It is predicted that potential VAT revenues will exceed actual VAT collections in the manufacturing, building, wholesale and retail trade, water supply, other social services, and arts, entertainment, and leisure sectors.

Post a Comment

0 Comments